Hannity & Colmes 17 May 2002 "Mansoor Ijaz explains!

FNC | 17 May 2002 | Johnpauljones

[JohnPaulJones]

Manzoor explains his that Sudan was willing to give UBL to the USA and Clinton refused!

[JohnPaulJones]

Post your comments!

[ET(end tyranny)]

My first comment is why didn't Hannity let Manssor finish??? Manssor was telling Rangle about how he had worked with the present administration as much as the previous and I 'think' he was going to say something negative about the Clinton administration, when Hannity stopped him to 'move on'. Argh!

[JohnPaulJones]

Rangle was clearly getting a little nervous about Mansoor facts and commnets...They clearly are going after GWB.....

[swheats]

Pre-emptive strike by Rangle. It seems they are turning the tables on Carl Rove. A few months back I believe it was Rove who said that Republicans can run their campaigns on the fact of how well the Bush Admin has ran this war.

Desperate Democrats if injured will harm anyone around them.

[lonestar]

Rangle did look nervous. He didn't know what to do with a non-politician who is smarter than he is. Rangle is all spin.

[ohioWfan]

My first comment is why didn't Hannity let Manssor finish???

My question too! I think he was going to say something important, and he was cut off! Hannity needs to develop his listening skills, IMO.

[swheats]

And a fellow Democrat speaking (gasp) the truth.

[ET(end tyranny)]

Yes, Rangle was nervous. He kept interupting Mansoor, it didn't seem to matter with what question, just keep Manssor from talking!

[ALOHA RONNIE]

.."I'm listening to this guy 'cause he's the only one out there making sense" =

...SHARPTON about MONSOOR IJAZ

[ET(end tyranny)]

Hannity does that a lot and it irks me. I think it was important too!! Now Mansoor will have to find another way to get what he wanted to say out.

[RandallFlagg]

I had to go to meet my Father-in-law for his birthday dinner with my Wife and Son, so...
I MISSED IT!!
I also missed Savage!!

Another weekend ruined
*sob*

[ALOHA RONNIE]

.."It was clear to me in my dealings with the CLINTON White House that the CLINTON Administration NEVER intended to do anything about Terrorism in the 1990's" =

...MONSOOR IJAZ.. on FoX News Channel 6 months ago

[Snow Bunny]

Thanks Ronnie !!!!

[mass55th]

This whole thing is going to blow up in the Democrats faces. They tried to get to Bush with the Enron mess and then realized that they may have opened up a can of worms. Then when Global Crossing went down the tubes, and several Democrats, including Terry McAuliffe could be linked to the Company, they dropped it like a hot potato. The new memos that came out today from '99 & '95 on prior terror notices, will force them to shut the hell up.

These Democrats are so dumb. If they're going to accuse Bush of doing something wrong, they'd better do their homework and make sure they've got their facts straight. The fact that these people never even made sure that there weren't any skeletons in their own closets before pointing the finger at Bush shows them to be the shallow and ignorant liars that they are.

[rwfromkansas]

bump

[rwfromkansas]

Likely it was what he said on Hannity's radio show. He said that he has worked with the Bush administration and that unlike the Clinton admin, Bush has swiftly looked into all the information he has provided.

[nutmeg]

I thought Rangel acted very strange tonight (stranger than usual). He jabbered on and on, and kept interrupting Mansoor Ijaz. Mansoor Ijaz apparently has lots of info that is damaging to DemocRATs, and Rangel didn't want him to get it out there.

[bybybill]

I missed Savage too, the SOB ducked

[GUIDO]

no you can watch a rerun, ours comes on at 12midnight i believe.