Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/17/2002 4:53:29 PM PDT by Starmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Starmaker
Apparently the FDA is content to approve worthless drugs based on the results of two statistically irrelevant tests regardless of the fact that the drugs have failed an exponentially greater number of tests

Better that then having the FDA be so strict that it blocks drugs that do work, or increases the costs of approval that experimental new drugs never make it to the design phase.

2 posted on 05/17/2002 4:57:18 PM PDT by Rodney King
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starmaker
It all depends on what the meaning of is,....is.
3 posted on 05/17/2002 5:04:55 PM PDT by elbucko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starmaker
yeah, but there is a lot of contradictory findings parroted by the media....eggs are bad b/c of cholesterol, eggs are ok. i always looked at this as a tactic to defraud st. johns wort, which has been used in europe for years with fine results. also, as of late, kava, which competes with benzodiazepines and barbituates for market share. check out the codex info for more insight.
5 posted on 05/17/2002 5:12:46 PM PDT by galt-jw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starmaker
While there are legitimate points within this article that I can agree with, the author goes on to make incredibly preposterous conclusions and offers nothing more than his personal opinion on something that should be regarded as fact 'because he has determined it so'.

So can just anyone become a 'columnist'? Just what kind of experience or qualifications are required? I've seen many Freepers who are far more intelligent and logical than these so called columnists.

I'm coming to the belief that columnists believe they are magically entitled to render judgement on things they know nothing about. Even worse, they don't even bother to gather information before issuing judgement.

6 posted on 05/17/2002 5:28:08 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starmaker
How then can an effective medical treatment be developed to treat a disorder that cannot be defined medically?

Very effective. Aspirin was used to relieve headaches long before anyone understood the precise mechanisms of headaches *or* just how aspirin combats headaches.

My mother went on interferon to combat her leukemia. There was a huge difference when she was on interferon pre-Zoloft and after Zoloft.

Now you may argue that was a placebo effect, that she only felt better because she thought she was on something that worked. Do you really think I give a hoot whether it was a placebo effect or an actual effect? Her emotional state is much better now (and she's beating the leukemia).

7 posted on 05/17/2002 5:36:29 PM PDT by Numbers Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starmaker
BUMP
10 posted on 05/17/2002 6:49:55 PM PDT by Aurelius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starmaker
EXCELLENT ARTICLE! THANKS!!! I have been thinking along the same lines for a while now. It's good to hear someone else putting it in writing.

Psychology is a fraud, founded in the lie that is secular humanism.

:) ttt

14 posted on 05/17/2002 8:09:21 PM PDT by detsaoT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starmaker
Before getting all excited over the results of one single solitary study which "debunks" psychopharmaceuticals, let's see it replicated. It may become apparent that something needs debunking, but that something isn't the drugs.
15 posted on 05/17/2002 8:26:53 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starmaker
A scientific discipline that is not dependent on clinical evidence or statistical proof is baseless.

More precisely, a theory that does not make falsifiable predictions does not belong in the science category. Psychology may have benefits to people, as does literature, art, music, and religion, but it doesn't belong in medical science.

18 posted on 05/17/2002 10:08:04 PM PDT by secretagent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starmaker
There is no such thing as a "mental illness." How can an intangible entity like the "mind" be said to be "ill?"

I agree. Lets not confuse a metaphor with reality.

Harmful or abnormal behavior is the result of either a medical disorder, in which case medical treatment is necessary, or sin, in which spiritual treatment is necessary.

Or the result of causes we'll never uncover. An eccentric may enjoy memorizing expired bus schedules - hard to classify this abnormal behavior as a medical condition or a sin.

19 posted on 05/17/2002 10:16:11 PM PDT by secretagent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson