I think the WH chose o release the info via Ari before the Rats released. McKinney has been chewing at the bit about this for a while. So I think this revelation by Ari was proactive rather than reactive.
I think one of the things the dems are trying to head off is the fact that
this investigation of what led up to 9-11 just might bring out a lot more corruption
from the Clinton administration. I can't see how it can be avoided but since
this little so-called revelation has been blown up way out of proportion, whatever comes out now can
be explained away by the dems as the repubs trying to tar Clinton to justify what they
are trying to convince people that Bush did.
Does that make sense or has my one glass of wine messed up my usual logical thought?
I have noticed tonight that the RATS a saying that they have went to the archives and pulled the briefing of that SAME day and it mentions nothing about hijackings or airplanes, and that they didn't get the same briefing the President did.
That's very clever when you factor in that the intelligence committee got the briefing the next day NOT the SAME day. ANOTHER RAT TACTIC.
Read the transcript of what Condi Rice said today and what Ari said, they got the briefing in question the day after the President did