That remark about Pope Urban would seem to reveal the rather exaggerated and sophomoric understanding of papal authority one might find among the more paranoid type of secular humanists.
So you disagree in that you don't think pope Urban would think highly of you? I think he would. I guess we'll have to agree to disagree then.
Really, if you are stalking this thread to heckle me or the articles of faith Catholics believe as revealed mysteries of religion, that kind of bigotry is not needed.
Talk abut paranoid -- look in the mirror. You give yourself way too much credit, for, you're just another poster and nothing special to me. Sorry if I don't abide by how you think I should or should not be acting. Do you want me to be a stalker or heckler? Would that make you feel better if I had some sort of vendetta?
I'm definitely not an Ultramontane papalist, so you are really barking up the wrong tree here.
How would I know if I'm barking up an Ultramontane papalist tree when I don't even know what a Ultramontane papalist is? I'll look it up
Ultramontane: favoring greater or absolute supremacy of papal over national or diocesan authority in the Roman Catholic Church.
I understand it. I don't have a clue as to how you came to assume that I was barking up that tree. I made a remark in response to you saying that you were forced to pull rank. I remarked on your presumption of authority. I just got a clue. My goodness dear lad, you do think highly of yourself. I "bestowed" upon you a little respect for your little authority. That is at the other end of the spectrum from absolute supremacy of papal over of national or diocesan authority in the Roman Catholic Church.
The analogy was that Pope Urban pulled rank and so did you try to pull rank. There is a huge disparity between what little power you have compared to the immense power Pope Urban had.
You've got the wrong guy for these thorns and nails.
They certainly aren't intended to be thorns and nails. As you analogize your self to Jesus Christ being crucified. You're beating yourself up by assuming things that I never intended nor implied. Twisting what I write into being a stalker and heckler and now you've got me accusing you of wanting to be an Ultramontane papalist. Do you not see how your "wounds" are self-inflicted.
I've asked several times. Please take your Zonosophical sermons elsewhere.
Were you a spoiled child that got everything he wanted because you asked several times? If so, wow! Reaching adulthood must have been a real eye-opener for you. I will meat you half way and not respond to any of your post wherein you don't include the words Neo-Tech, Zonpower, Zon or reference me. In other words, so long as you don't mention those words or obvious Neo-Tech issues I'll not respond to your posts. If you do continue "talking" about Neo-Tech or Zonpower or any of your made up terminology (Zonology etc.) I still probably won't respond, but I may.
BTW, denouncing the initiation of force via the three Articles of the Neo-Tech constitution is not a sermon -- it's common sense to not initiated force or threat of force, right?