I'm betting on the burst bubble being yours, bub. You were doing such an excellent job on the 2nd amendment threads. Then you did the philosophical equivalent of bending over and passing gas.
What is a bub you keep mentioning? Is that your cutesy-wootzie idea of an insult or way to belittle. If it is, here's a hint, I think it demonstrates your redneck immaturity.
The core foundation of Neo-Tech is the Neo-Tech Constitution. Here's is the crux of what you call "the philosophical equivalent of bending over and passing gas." Followed by three simple questions for you to answer.
From the Neo-Tech Constitution.
Article 1
No person, group of persons, or government may initiate force, threat of force, or fraud against any individual's self or property.
Article 2
Force may be morally and legally used only in self-defense against those who violate Article 1.
Article 3
No exceptions shall exist for Articles 1 and 2.
Questions:
Whose rights do you want to violate by initiating force against them?
Or are you so cowardly that you would petition government agents to initiate force on your behalf?
More importantly, what person, group or government do you want to violate your individual-property rights?