To: grimalkin
How large does a satellite have to be to be considered a moon or is that just a common phrase that doesnt have an actual astronomical definition?
Owl_Eagle
Guns Before Butter.
To: Owl_Eagle
From what I've read, the only difference between a small moon and an asteroid is what they are bound to by gravity. Perhaps someone else will have further info.
5 posted on
05/16/2002 4:01:33 PM PDT by
grimalkin
To: Owl_Eagle
How large does a satellite have to be to be considered a moon or is that just a common phrase that doesnt have an actual astronomical definition? Basically, anything observable is a moon. Phobos and Diemos of Mars, for example, are 14 and 9 miles respectively.
To: Owl_Eagle
"How large does a satellite have to be to be considered a moon or is that just a common phrase that doesnt have an actual astronomical definition?" It just has to be a satellite. Pluto is more interesting in this regard. Some are contemplating removing it from planet status because it is basically moon-sized.
22 posted on
05/17/2002 5:02:39 AM PDT by
Movemout
To: Owl_Eagle
Any natural object, even a speck of sand, that is orbiting the larger object could be considered a moon. Some orbits are highly unusual and sometimes objects are captured by gravity to become moons and other times moons are lost. These small asteroid-like bodies are all moons for the time being.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson