It isn't about "liberty." It never was and never will be. It is about the freedon to get stinking drunk or high at someone else's expense and pretend that no one else in inconvenienced or harmed.
Hey, Komrade truenospinzone, Kommissar George Soros is proud of your efforts on behalf of the nannyland.
No other option makes any sense whatsoever. No one could possibly contribute so little to so many honest discussions without an ulterior motive. No one could possibly write so many words and say so very little without an illicit cause. No one could possibly do so much to undermine and lampoon a stance without being fully aware of it.
Then you don't like DUI and speed zone laws either. After all, some people can rip through a school zone drunk at 40 mph and never injure a child, let alone kill one.
In the name of "liberty" you would prohibit all laws that restrict the one exceptional citizen in a thousand who might be able to safely negotiate his way through devastation, or--if devastation results--can pick up the tab out of his own pocket.
Meanwhile the 800 who believe they can do the same, but cannot (dopers and drunks always grossly overestimate their abilities while smashed or stoned) would kill and destroy with reckless abandon and leave everyone else to pay the bills. That's not a problem in a nanny state, you see. Simply tax everyone else to pay the bills, and while you're at it treat the user/abuser as a "victim" in his own right and send him to tax-supported rehab.
The liberdopian mantra: "Drugs, drugs, drugs. Gimme drugs, drugs, drugs. But it ain't about drugs. It's about liberty. So gimme . . . drugs, drugs, drugs. If I kill or harm someone or damage their property, it wasn't me that did it. It was the drugs, drugs, drugs. I'm a victim, so pay up and make me better. Then gimme . . . more drugs, drugs, drugs."