The accounts of the evidence presented by Anslinger, and his testimony before Congress are readily available on the net. Can you point to any of it that would stand up as objectively defensible arguments? Nixon commissioned research into the effects of marijuana, and then threw it out because it didn't support his pre-conceived ideas. Our drug policy is closer to being based on "Reefer Madness" than the available research.
With that ridiculous remark, any credibility in your argument, just went out the window.