Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Roscoe; wacko
To: wacko
That wasn't self defense.
That was egomaniac looking for some media attention,
ignorant of the Constitution and/or unconcerned with the damage he was doing to the RKBA.
# 495 by Roscoe

******************

Neither Stanley nor any other man can "damage" the right to keep and bear arms.

Access to weapons is not the only way to defend yourself, but barring outnumbering your opponents, it is the most practical way.

499 posted on 05/17/2002 1:02:43 AM PDT by exodus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 495 | View Replies ]


To: exodus
Neither Stanley nor any other man can "damage" the right to keep and bear arms.

He can and he did. The productive work of others to establish protective state legislation is now tarnished because a baffoon wanted a cheap headline.

HCI should love Stanley.

502 posted on 05/17/2002 1:14:02 AM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 499 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson