[exodus]

To: Spiff; tpaine; billofrights; zon
"So why did Stanley ignorantly invoke the Second Amendment in his loss?..."
# 485 by Roscoe

******************

The legal result makes no difference...Stanley has the right to defend himself.

That right includes the right to be ready to defend himself. If you don't have your weapon with you, you can't fight back. The judgement is both a violation of Stanley's freedom, and a violation of the Constitution.

[Roscoe]

The legal result makes no difference...

Sure it does. HCI should send Stanley's campaign a "Thank You" donation.