[exodus]

To: William Terrell
"...this is a sickening but unfortunate part of the judicial process, yes the Constitution can be excluded.

You as a defendent & your attorney cannot read the law/statute as it is printed on the books to the jury, you cannot read or refer to the Constitution as it is written, you as a juror cannot go out and research the case and any associated laws or discover anything on your own.

The judge can tailor and restrict the testimony and instuctions to the jury in any manner they see fit, to how ever it serves their agenda or their supporter's agenda the best.

This is true in all courts.
It is digusting and revolting more so than any crime,
the justice system is a criminal entity within itself,
serving itself, to perpetuate itself.
# 62 by chuknospam

******************

Good post, chuknospam.
It's worth repeating.

The defendent isn't allowed to use established law to protect himself, but the government can decide which laws apply, and tell the jury to ignore all conflicting law.

[William Terrell]

From what I understand, in a jury trial, jury instructions is virtually the only basis for an appeal from the ruling of a corrupt or ignorant judge and a stacked jury.