[sinkspur]

If you can't be impartial for disagreeing with the law, you are no more able to be impartial for agreeing with the law.

This is illogical on its face, but you don't see it, which is not surprising.

If I disagree with a law, it is highly unlikely I would even be on the jury, as I would make certain the court was so informed.

[Maelstrom]

If I disagree with a law, it is highly unlikely I would even be on the jury, as I would make certain the court was so informed.

You'll have to explain how being prejudiced against a law is less impartial than being prejudiced for a law and why such a stand is indeed logical.