Raising issues irrelvant to the court proceeding. Juries make decisions of facts. They don't issue rulings of law.
Upon what do you base such an attack on Mr. Grant? Please be specific.
Raising issues irrelvant to the court proceeding. Juries make decisions of facts. They don't issue rulings of law.
You failed the class that taught the definition of 'specific', right... or do you just not know how to use a dictionary? Raising issues?? By gosh those issues, whatever they are sure does specify them -- NOT! And 'irrelevant', what was irrelevant? The issues were irrelevant is what you're saying. What issues and why do you call them irrelevant? You responded in general but tried to pass it off as being specific. Just like a politician not answering the question and weasel-wording around it.
You are the only person that I have read on this thread that seems to think Grant sought the jury to issue a ruling of law. So you base your attack in part on your own mind-spun fabrication. Not to worry, I've come to expect the worst from you.
Perpahs you're familiar with the case involving farmer Taung Min Lin and a Kangaroo Rat. He ran over it with his tractor and violated the Endagered Species Act. He faced $200,000 fine and prison time. His $50,000 tractor was confiscated. If you were on the jury would you convict?