Politicians have a vested intrerest in the proliferation of violence and pandemonium because it gives them the justification they need to further expand government.
Politicians have a vested intrerest in the proliferation of violence and pandemonium because it gives them the justification they need to further expand government.
To further this line of thinking... of natural law, common law, common sense...
During Clinton's eight years as President 25,000 laws and regulations were created. That's three-thousand laws a year. Politicians, bureaucrats, mainstream media and much of academia would have us believe that we didn't need this years newly created 3,000 laws last year. Nor did we need those new laws the year before that or the year before, etc.
Likewise, the 3,000 newly created laws in 2003 won't be needed until that year. ...And the 3,000 new laws created in 2004? What about them? They'd have us believe that we can live without those laws for a couple of more years but we will need them come 2004.
Oh, and /BTW, we will always need those laws and this is proven by the fact that for every 3,000 newly created laws maybe a dozen old laws get repealed.
My question is, how did people and society ever manage to survive and prosper for 200 years without all those laws but somehow when it comes time to write 3,000 new laws each year we can't live without them.