Therein lies part of the problem, sir. Firstly the courts in this country aren't their courts, they are ours, "we the people" 's! The courts aren't feudal fiefdoms, and the judges most certainly are NOT midieval lordlings, nor are we serfs, subject to their whims! The deeds to the buildings are NOT in their names, either jointly or severally, the robes they wear, the gavels they hold, and the benches where they park their arrogant and ample posteriors are not their private property, but ours! And what we have bestowed, we CAN take back, if abused.
That being said, counsel for the defense in this case, having received such a letter from this particular judge, had every right , and should have in his first motion, demanded this obviously biased judge recuse himself. The Constitution is law whether this judge likes that idea or not, and a judge whose bias refuses to recognize the law, is no fit judge for any legal matter...
the infowarrior