Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AppyPappy
yes, i see that NONE Of them want to address the fact that the kid would have been permitted to attend tuition free if the mom would agree to stop stripping. MOMMY wouldn't. now whose fault is that? if she was so concerned that the little girls last month of school not be disrupted, couldn't she just LIE and give it til school was out and then go back to it? NO, she has no intentions of quitting and is resentful that she is being required to. she wants her cake and to eat it too, christian school financed by stripping.
60 posted on 05/16/2002 5:19:19 AM PDT by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: xsmommy
es, i see that NONE Of them want to address the fact that the kid would have been permitted to attend tuition free if the mom would agree to stop stripping.

You are making my no brains point. Free tuition doesn not Feed and Clothe the child does it?

65 posted on 05/16/2002 5:21:04 AM PDT by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

To: xsmommy
Mommy this mommy that. It's amazing that this thread has seemed to ignore the one person who really seems to count here, the little girl. Even if the mother was the absolute spawn of Satan, I can't comprehend why the school wouldn't try to save the little girl, and to hell with the mother.

From where I sit, the school is abdicating it's Christian responsibility to try to save this little girl's soul, because it has a problem with the mother's behavior.

386 posted on 05/16/2002 10:16:37 AM PDT by Melas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson