[lavaroise]

But....You left one thing out.

The Child.

The child is implicitly hostage/supportive to the woman's conduct. Would you let a terrorist live in the US simply because the child over which it has control need an American education? I don't think so.

[hobbes1]

You propostition is backwards...Would I give the child asylum....Of course.

[hobbes1]

Not to mention comparing stripping to terrorism, is hardly a sound analogy.

Should the School be able to exclude, by virtue of the parents occupation, children of Criminal Defense attorneys?