Never mind any relation to truth, this article contradicts itself: He says that the powers-that-be allowed three planes to strike their targets. Then he claims that:
There is credible evidence to suggest that the downing of American Airlines Flight 11 - the plane that was downed in Shanksville, Pennsylvania a rural community approximately 80 miles southeast of Pittsburgh was not the result of heroism on the parts of the passengers on board that plane but the deliberate shooting by one of those fighter jets.
If so, why did the government choose to stop one flight, but not the other three?
It might've been a decently argued alternative viewpoint. Problem is that the left cannot stand any display of genuine heroism by Americans -- such as was displayed on flight 93. Reflexive hatred leads to self-contradiction.
This guy's a moron - for starters, it was UA93, not AA11 that crashed in Pennsylvania. The latter was piloted by Atta into the North Tower at 8:45am. Credibility gap? I think it all is evident that this source has none. "United We Stand - Divided We Fall"? I think blacks in America should wake up and disavow damaging "publications" such as this one.
They only shot down this one and not the others because the co-pilot was African American. That makes perfect sense, or about as much sense as the rest of the article.