Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AppyPappy
No he is charging people to enjoy his view.

That's right, it's HIS view, now. It's his right to charge what5ever he wants for it. However, he is not charging for the view, he is offering to sell his land, which he owns, fair and square. Any or all of the homeowners could have done the same thing. They blew it.

He had to PAY to stop people from enjoying the view from the property.

WRONG. He had to pay to buy the land. He did. He owns it.

This is not a matter of his innocence. He had to pay a lot of money to extort money from the people on the lake.

First of all, $1K isn't a lot when it comes to purchasing property, especially lake front property. He bought the property fair and square. Once it's his property, he can charge whatever price he wants for it. If people don't want to pay that price, then he won't sell it. If erecting a fence raises the value of the property, it's his right to do so.

94 posted on 05/14/2002 6:25:41 AM PDT by freedomcrusader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]


To: freedomcrusader
He had to pay to erect the fence so he could deny people the right to their view of the lake. He had to pay someone to pay it pink. He acted with malice to hurt the people around the lake in order to extort money from them.
103 posted on 05/14/2002 6:30:54 AM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson