Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AppyPappy
That still doesn't deny them the right to enjoy their property.

Nothing he's done has prevented them from enjoying their property, they're just no longer able to enjoy HIS property.

75 posted on 05/14/2002 6:13:58 AM PDT by freedomcrusader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: freedomcrusader; All
Nothing he's done has prevented them from enjoying their property, they're just no longer able to enjoy HIS property.

Actually, they can still enjoy his property (the view), they just have to walk up to and look over his fence to do it.

81 posted on 05/14/2002 6:18:06 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

To: freedomcrusader
No he is charging people to enjoy his view. He had to PAY to stop people from enjoying the view from the property. This is not a matter of his innocence. He had to pay a lot of money to extort money from the people on the lake. The purpose of the fence is to deny people the right to the enjoyment of their property for the expressed purpose of obtaining money to remove the fence. He actually built the fence to DENY people the right to see the lake so he could extort money from them.

He paid to put up the fence so he could charge people to take down the fence. There is no other reason for the fence except to extort money.

84 posted on 05/14/2002 6:19:51 AM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson