Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: E Rocc
There's room for judgement, and that judgement stops far short of the Korean store owner's rights to charge what he can -- for no one of his customers is forced to shop at his store only.

Here we have a neighborhood, built around a lake, centered around the lake, landscaped to the lake, with the people having bought the lots in a planned subdivision where the lake was part of the plan. Now those folks have an ugly, naught but view-blocking fence in their backyards, built by a man who built the fence just for the sake of having them pay to take it down.

You might have a fine Jewelery store downtown someday. And maybe then some stinking ragged grifter will come to sleep near your entryway and p&ss against it. And the grifter wants $1,000 to move away. Would ask the city to pass a law against such, or will you advocate the right of freemen to stink, sleep and p&ss where they may?

613 posted on 05/14/2002 11:02:04 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 504 | View Replies ]


To: bvw
Here we have a neighborhood, built around a lake, centered around the lake, landscaped to the lake, with the people having bought the lots in a planned subdivision where the lake was part of the plan.

Funny...all that work and intent, yet they never actually bothered to PAY for that lake.

Setting up one's property to enjoy someone else's property for free, then expecting some right to the latter's property, is foolish.

I enjoy the fact that my property is surrounded by someone else's hayfields. If the farmer decides to turn his property into a housing development or build a fence at our border, I have no right to stop him, other than to offer to buy that property at a mutually acceptable price.

629 posted on 05/14/2002 11:15:24 AM PDT by ctdonath2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 613 | View Replies ]

To: bvw
There's room for judgement, and that judgement stops far short of the Korean store owner's rights to charge what he can -- for no one of his customers is forced to shop at his store only.

Here we have a neighborhood, built around a lake, centered around the lake, landscaped to the lake, with the people having bought the lots in a planned subdivision where the lake was part of the plan. Now those folks have an ugly, naught but view-blocking fence in their backyards, built by a man who built the fence just for the sake of having them pay to take it down.

A lake that none of them owned the shore around, that none of them made the effort to buy the shore around. He built the fence because they refused to discuss buying the property that they all took for granted and used for free...until he bought it.
You might have a fine Jewelery store downtown someday. And maybe then some stinking ragged grifter will come to sleep near your entryway and p&ss against it. And the grifter wants $1,000 to move away. Would ask the city to pass a law against such, or will you advocate the right of freemen to stink, sleep and p&ss where they may?
My Korean grocer example is more to the point because they have invested in their operations and have the right to their property, peace or no peace.

Your hypothetical stinking Demo....errr......bum actually resembles the homeowners more, as far as the lake property is concerned. They wish to use it without buying it.

-Eric

632 posted on 05/14/2002 11:17:45 AM PDT by E Rocc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 613 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson