Skip to comments.
View for sale: $30,000 New owner of a lake fences it off when homeowners wouldn't pay.
St. Petersburg Times ^
| May 14, 2002
| ROBERT FARLEY
Posted on 05/14/2002 5:05:40 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 941-960, 961-980, 981-1,000 ... 1,141-1,147 next last
To: Lazamataz
In my entire life, I have never ONCE seen this sequence of events. I have seen Eminent Domain condemnations for roadways and widenings thereof, and for public parks. That is it.
I'd add schools to your list.
However, local government are increasingly using using eminent domain to assemble large parcels for sale to prive interests in the name of economic development. This is an abuse of the process.
Reason magazine has done a number of stories (example) and the Institute for Justice has helped the small owners in some of these cases.
To: Lazamataz
And quit it with that "et cetera" and "ad hominem" and "ergo" crap. Speekie zee English? This ain't Latin America, ya know! ;-)
Comment #963 Removed by Moderator
Comment #964 Removed by Moderator
To: the bottle let me down
However, local government are increasingly using using eminent domain to assemble large parcels for sale to prive interests in the name of economic development. This is an abuse of the process.Absolutely! This is nothing more than the Stalinesque-style destruction of the Kulak back in the 1930's!!! I would absolutely, heatedly fight such a step towards pure Marxism.
Comment #966 Removed by Moderator
To: You are here
Give the link and QUOTE, where I said that I had equal rights to your property. In those EXACT words.
Can't do it because I NEVER said that.
I never claimed to have any rights to your rat infested property.
Comment #968 Removed by Moderator
Comment #969 Removed by Moderator
To: You are here
Are you Jack Thompson, esq., of Florida?
Comment #971 Removed by Moderator
To: Cincinatus' Wife
People liked getting the view for free when they bought the property. No way they didn't know it wasn't part of their property.
Now if they want what they had for free it will cost them.
That is the tough part, being charged for what was free before.
A lesson in life that nothing is free anymore.
To: AppyPappy
The $30k did not mean they owned the lake. It meant the fence came down.Wrong. He explicitly offered to sell the lake to the homeowners for $30K apiece.
973
posted on
05/14/2002 3:02:30 PM PDT
by
Poohbah
Comment #974 Removed by Moderator
Comment #975 Removed by Moderator
Comment #976 Removed by Moderator
To: You are here
If you are a burden and a net negative to this forum, I will certainly be pointing it out to the Powers That Be.
I love this place, and I will not permit idiocy, threats of litigation, threats of real-world intervention, etc., to destroy it.
To: maxwell
max, quit hogging the popcorn....
978
posted on
05/14/2002 3:07:05 PM PDT
by
xsmommy
To: You are here
BTW, I notice that you repeatedly ignore
refutations to your claims, merrily skipping to the next point like a nervous, gambling Chihuahua on methamphetamines.
Comment #980 Removed by Moderator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 941-960, 961-980, 981-1,000 ... 1,141-1,147 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson