Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

View for sale: $30,000 New owner of a lake fences it off when homeowners wouldn't pay.
St. Petersburg Times ^ | May 14, 2002 | ROBERT FARLEY

Posted on 05/14/2002 5:05:40 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

EAST LAKE -- Many residents thought they owned the lake behind their $300,000 homes. They mowed up to the water line and chipped in yearly to treat the lake for algae blooms.

So it came as quite a shock Thursday when workers began erecting a 6-foot-high fence around the lake, obliterating their view.

For good measure, the workers painted a portion of the fence behind Alice Beehner's home bright pink and decorated it with sparkles.

"Isn't that atrocious?" Mrs. Beehner said Monday, pointing to the fence a few feet from her screened-in pool. "It's sickening!"

For 10 years the developer of their Tarpon Woods subdivision had let the taxes lapse on the 4-acre lake and a thin band of land around it.

A real estate speculator swooped in to purchase it for $1,000 at a delinquent tax sale in February. The speculator, 44-year-old Don Connolly of Valrico, now is offering to sell the land behind each of the homes for $30,000 per homeowner.

Residents ignored a letter from Connolly, trustee of the Lake Alice Land Trust that purchased the lake, offering to sell. Instead, someone took a couple of survey posts marking the property boundaries and threw them into the lake.

Connolly said that's when he decided to build the fence.

He started behind Beehner's meticulously landscaped property. The new fence separated her from two mature laurel oaks she planted shortly after moving into her home 17 years ago.


[Times photo: Jim Damaske] The fence behind the house of Alice Beehner, with dogs Beethoven and Bridgette, is pink with sparkles. Don Connolly says the color is to warn workers to stay away "because that person is very volatile and confronted us in the past."

"It's total extortion," Mrs. Beehner, 61, said Monday.

Connolly said he offered to sell the property to the homeowners as a courtesy.

"Is selling a piece of land extortion?" he said. "That doesn't make any sense to me."

He said he specializes in buying properties at tax sales. Records show he owns 50 properties in Pinellas County. Connolly said he owns 150 to 200 statewide.

"When people don't pay their taxes, this is what happens," he said. "I was willing to pay more than anyone else for this property. . . . The business we're in is unpleasant sometimes."

Connolly knows the consequences of failing to pay taxes.

Records show that in 1997 he was charged with failing to remit more than $100,000 worth of sales tax for an auto sales business he owned in Hillsborough County. Connolly blamed it on the company's accounting firm and said he reached a settlement with the state.

Because homeowners have rebuffed his offer, Connolly said, he now plans to develop two or three "executive" homes overlooking the lake. It might entail a dredge and fill project to move the lake a bit to the south, he said.

County officials said that would be difficult, if not impossible, to accomplish.

"He can't build on it unless he replaces the stormwater drainage," said Al Navaroli, a manager for the county's Development Review Services Department. "And pretty much all of it is stormwater drainage. . . . He's limited in what he can do."

But there's nothing to prevent Connolly from erecting the fence, Navaroli said, or painting it any color he chooses.

"I certainly see the man is trying to be obnoxious to his neighbors," Navaroli said. "But I don't see that he's violating any codes."

On Monday, the fence stretched across three of the 15 waterfront lots. He plans to extend it all the way around the lake.

"My intention is not to annoy anyone," he said.

As for painting the fence pink behind Mrs. Beehner's property, Connolly said, it was done to warn workers to stay away from that site "because that person is very volatile and confronted us in the past."

Connolly said he was shocked by the vitriol from some of the residents. The offer to sell small pieces of land to individual homeowners is off the table. Connolly said he is now negotiating with one homeowner interested in buying the entire 4.7-acre property.

He would not say how much he is asking. "I'm a reasonable man," Connolly said.

Mrs. Beehner warns the pink fence behind her property could be erected behind any number of homes in Pinellas.

"People need to be warned," she said. "This could happen in your back yard."

Connolly said he owns one other lake in Pinellas County.

But Navaroli said his office believes Connolly may own several properties that neighborhoods consider common areas. Navaroli said he warned the county property appraiser's office more than a year ago about the danger of taxing undevelopable lands, such as retention ponds, or selling those lands at tax sale.

"It's a pretty disgusting mess," said County Commissioner Susan Latvala. "We have to prevent this from happening again. That kind of property should not be for sale."

As for the Tarpon Woods lake, however, county officials said there may be nothing they can do to help the homeowners.

Some homeowners blame the developer, Lloyd Ferrentino for allowing the taxes to lapse. At the very least, some said, he should have notified the property owners so they could have tried to buy it. Ferrentino could not be reached Monday.

On Monday, Connolly's workers continued their fence-building, extending it behind the home of Peter Cieslinski. Cieslinski, 44, who was just released from active duty in the Navy a week ago, said he can't believe the county would allow someone to come in and take away his view of the alligators, turtles and wading birds.

"I look at it this way: There's the spirit of the law and the letter of the law," Cieslinski said. "The county is looking at this as the letter of the law. There's got to be a legal Latin term for "the law says this, but wait a minute, look at the extenuating circumstances.' "

Mrs. Beehner said neighbors plan to hire an attorney.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: property
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 521-540541-560561-580 ... 1,141-1,147 next last
To: Cincinatus' Wife
"Connolly said he offered to sell the property to the homeowners as a courtesy."

The guy does own the land, and he can do what he wants. But $30K a pop for property these people already thought they owned? Hardly a courtesy.

541 posted on 05/14/2002 10:14:35 AM PDT by MEGoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: one_particular_harbour
I don't think the priciples have changed as much as the application. Although I don't have the time to do the research now, I do recall reading a case in the not so distant past where the court declined to apply the priciples to structures erected soley to harrass and annoy.
542 posted on 05/14/2002 10:14:57 AM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 497 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Number one, you go straight down to the county tax office and demand an assessment on property value. The value just went down by 8 percent in my book. So all of these houses just lost value. And the county just lost tax revenue, which they will quickly assess that this is not a good thing and the county commission will take a look at what happened. Number two. You offer this guy precisely what he paid for it plus cost of the fence, and $2000 on top of that...and hint thats the top of any offer you will make. When he says no, you turn around to the county tax assessor and hint that this guy owns beach front property and thus he needs to have a real assessment. Let him enjoy five years of paying taxes on this property and figure out that he cannot get any more cash than what was offered. Do not give in or pay the extra cash.
543 posted on 05/14/2002 10:15:03 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

Comment #544 Removed by Moderator

To: You are here
I read the article. Did you read my post?
545 posted on 05/14/2002 10:15:56 AM PDT by NativeNewYorker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 537 | View Replies]

To: You are here
He IS a lawyer, believe it or not.
546 posted on 05/14/2002 10:17:31 AM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 544 | View Replies]

Comment #547 Removed by Moderator

To: Rainmist
The second summer we were there, a sweet policeman came up and regretfully told us that the lake had become private for the subdivision and we couldn't fish there.

I'm curious about this "sweet" policeman. Did he inform you that he was acting on a complaint? Did you ask him who you might contact to address the permission issue and the complaint? Did you try to get permission? Like I said, just curious because of the trespass issue. Were you prepared to sign a release that said that you would hold the property owner harmless in the event that you or you son was injured on the private property? Why did you automatically assume that the owers were crabby old men and not just people who were afraid of liability issues in our increasingly litigous society?

548 posted on 05/14/2002 10:18:24 AM PDT by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 507 | View Replies]

To: Crusher138
She takes it to court and loses! Seems that since his outpost was legal, she had no assumption of privacy. Fined and community service!

Thanks for your post!

549 posted on 05/14/2002 10:18:38 AM PDT by ET(end tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 533 | View Replies]

To: E Rocc
In other words, she thought it was antisocial behavior with the goal of changing things to suit the misbehavers.

Maxine rationalized and attempted to justify the anti-social behavior of the rioters.

550 posted on 05/14/2002 10:19:18 AM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 536 | View Replies]

To: FatherTorque,Kevin Curry

Ah, but then we're facing the immutable libertarian law which states that prohibition fosters allurement. In order to discourage use of the lake, the owner needs to get rid of the fence and instead place inviting enticements, such as easy parking access and paved walkways. Then no one will use the lake.

551 posted on 05/14/2002 10:20:15 AM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
"The Speculator" should be pushed into the lake. I hope that the aligator is not too picky.

Murder and being eaten alive as a "fix" for your perception of this person? How very conservative of you, not to mention moral.

552 posted on 05/14/2002 10:20:51 AM PDT by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 539 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Curry
Gloat on his behalf all you want

Who's gloating?

I am merely pointing out that this contest is not as one sided (good v. evil) as some here beleive. It is primarily a determination of which party is entitled to the windfall.

553 posted on 05/14/2002 10:23:08 AM PDT by CharacterCounts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 534 | View Replies]

Comment #554 Removed by Moderator

Comment #555 Removed by Moderator

To: Lazamataz ; technochick99
I am mistaken. They never owned the property. We are buying into a similar situation -- we will be buying a pond-lot with a use-easement (at least) to midway into the pond. But it will be the developers property, so we will need to make sure the land is permanently a pond, and that he keeps taxes up.

I will need to take my own advice here(I don't as much as I should since I actually live in Lansing, but vote at another address). I don't know Illinois local politics, but in Michigan, I live in a "township" which is almost like a mini county. We have a township trustee by precinct and a supervisor, and a county commishioner by precinct. Some counties have executives, and others do not. Townships I believe have most zoning procedures. We don't have a neighborhood association, and the area I'm at is zoned agricultural(I always said I'm a country guy).

If I were you, I'd be on a first name basis with your township officials or city council members, and also your county commishioners and neighborhood associations, if any. If you can't beat em, join em.

Any politically oriented organization at any level even tends to listen to or at least respect those(unless they are obnoxious and contribute nothing constructive...like PETA) that are always at their meetings. I've been active in the Livingston County GOP for only about a year, and I am already been considered for executive board in the near future, because I show up and contribute my time.

When I settle down to one spot for good, I'll be an active presense at those meetings.

556 posted on 05/14/2002 10:26:35 AM PDT by Dan from Michigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 290 | View Replies]

Comment #557 Removed by Moderator

To: You are here
Then, you must do your level-best to overturn this unjust law, this Eminent Domain monster that you despise so much.

I, of course, will fight you every step of the way. I find myself in good company, since the Founding Fathers were the ones who established the premises on which Eminent Domain law is foundationed.

558 posted on 05/14/2002 10:27:14 AM PDT by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 554 | View Replies]

Comment #559 Removed by Moderator

To: You are here; justshutupandtakeit
Whatever, Mr. Statist.

LOL! No problem, Mr. Anarchist.

 

 

 justshutupandtakeit, you are right. If you ever disagree with those who would see the established laws of our land overturned, out comes the statist rubberstamp. LOL!

560 posted on 05/14/2002 10:29:24 AM PDT by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 557 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 521-540541-560561-580 ... 1,141-1,147 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson