Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

View for sale: $30,000 New owner of a lake fences it off when homeowners wouldn't pay.
St. Petersburg Times ^ | May 14, 2002 | ROBERT FARLEY

Posted on 05/14/2002 5:05:40 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

EAST LAKE -- Many residents thought they owned the lake behind their $300,000 homes. They mowed up to the water line and chipped in yearly to treat the lake for algae blooms.

So it came as quite a shock Thursday when workers began erecting a 6-foot-high fence around the lake, obliterating their view.

For good measure, the workers painted a portion of the fence behind Alice Beehner's home bright pink and decorated it with sparkles.

"Isn't that atrocious?" Mrs. Beehner said Monday, pointing to the fence a few feet from her screened-in pool. "It's sickening!"

For 10 years the developer of their Tarpon Woods subdivision had let the taxes lapse on the 4-acre lake and a thin band of land around it.

A real estate speculator swooped in to purchase it for $1,000 at a delinquent tax sale in February. The speculator, 44-year-old Don Connolly of Valrico, now is offering to sell the land behind each of the homes for $30,000 per homeowner.

Residents ignored a letter from Connolly, trustee of the Lake Alice Land Trust that purchased the lake, offering to sell. Instead, someone took a couple of survey posts marking the property boundaries and threw them into the lake.

Connolly said that's when he decided to build the fence.

He started behind Beehner's meticulously landscaped property. The new fence separated her from two mature laurel oaks she planted shortly after moving into her home 17 years ago.


[Times photo: Jim Damaske] The fence behind the house of Alice Beehner, with dogs Beethoven and Bridgette, is pink with sparkles. Don Connolly says the color is to warn workers to stay away "because that person is very volatile and confronted us in the past."

"It's total extortion," Mrs. Beehner, 61, said Monday.

Connolly said he offered to sell the property to the homeowners as a courtesy.

"Is selling a piece of land extortion?" he said. "That doesn't make any sense to me."

He said he specializes in buying properties at tax sales. Records show he owns 50 properties in Pinellas County. Connolly said he owns 150 to 200 statewide.

"When people don't pay their taxes, this is what happens," he said. "I was willing to pay more than anyone else for this property. . . . The business we're in is unpleasant sometimes."

Connolly knows the consequences of failing to pay taxes.

Records show that in 1997 he was charged with failing to remit more than $100,000 worth of sales tax for an auto sales business he owned in Hillsborough County. Connolly blamed it on the company's accounting firm and said he reached a settlement with the state.

Because homeowners have rebuffed his offer, Connolly said, he now plans to develop two or three "executive" homes overlooking the lake. It might entail a dredge and fill project to move the lake a bit to the south, he said.

County officials said that would be difficult, if not impossible, to accomplish.

"He can't build on it unless he replaces the stormwater drainage," said Al Navaroli, a manager for the county's Development Review Services Department. "And pretty much all of it is stormwater drainage. . . . He's limited in what he can do."

But there's nothing to prevent Connolly from erecting the fence, Navaroli said, or painting it any color he chooses.

"I certainly see the man is trying to be obnoxious to his neighbors," Navaroli said. "But I don't see that he's violating any codes."

On Monday, the fence stretched across three of the 15 waterfront lots. He plans to extend it all the way around the lake.

"My intention is not to annoy anyone," he said.

As for painting the fence pink behind Mrs. Beehner's property, Connolly said, it was done to warn workers to stay away from that site "because that person is very volatile and confronted us in the past."

Connolly said he was shocked by the vitriol from some of the residents. The offer to sell small pieces of land to individual homeowners is off the table. Connolly said he is now negotiating with one homeowner interested in buying the entire 4.7-acre property.

He would not say how much he is asking. "I'm a reasonable man," Connolly said.

Mrs. Beehner warns the pink fence behind her property could be erected behind any number of homes in Pinellas.

"People need to be warned," she said. "This could happen in your back yard."

Connolly said he owns one other lake in Pinellas County.

But Navaroli said his office believes Connolly may own several properties that neighborhoods consider common areas. Navaroli said he warned the county property appraiser's office more than a year ago about the danger of taxing undevelopable lands, such as retention ponds, or selling those lands at tax sale.

"It's a pretty disgusting mess," said County Commissioner Susan Latvala. "We have to prevent this from happening again. That kind of property should not be for sale."

As for the Tarpon Woods lake, however, county officials said there may be nothing they can do to help the homeowners.

Some homeowners blame the developer, Lloyd Ferrentino for allowing the taxes to lapse. At the very least, some said, he should have notified the property owners so they could have tried to buy it. Ferrentino could not be reached Monday.

On Monday, Connolly's workers continued their fence-building, extending it behind the home of Peter Cieslinski. Cieslinski, 44, who was just released from active duty in the Navy a week ago, said he can't believe the county would allow someone to come in and take away his view of the alligators, turtles and wading birds.

"I look at it this way: There's the spirit of the law and the letter of the law," Cieslinski said. "The county is looking at this as the letter of the law. There's got to be a legal Latin term for "the law says this, but wait a minute, look at the extenuating circumstances.' "

Mrs. Beehner said neighbors plan to hire an attorney.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: property
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 1,141-1,147 next last
To: AppyPappy
You cannot purposefully build an ugly fence in order to hurt your neighbor's resale value.

Why not? Because it doesn't make you feel good? That's a nice basis for law.

101 posted on 05/14/2002 6:29:29 AM PDT by Sloth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
The fence was built purposefully to DENY people the use of their property (ie a view they previously enjoyed).

The view was never theirs. It was the p[roperty of the developers, and now it is the property of this opportunist. They can purchase and secure ownership of the view for one-tenth what they paid for the property and view they DO own.

102 posted on 05/14/2002 6:30:50 AM PDT by freedomcrusader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: freedomcrusader
He had to pay to erect the fence so he could deny people the right to their view of the lake. He had to pay someone to pay it pink. He acted with malice to hurt the people around the lake in order to extort money from them.
103 posted on 05/14/2002 6:30:54 AM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

Comment #104 Removed by Moderator

To: You are here
Man, that sounds familiar. Where have I heard it before? Oh, right -- Karl Marx.

Yeah, whatever.

105 posted on 05/14/2002 6:31:44 AM PDT by Hemingway's Ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: freedomcrusader
He doesn't own the view of the lake, just the lake. He can't charge airplanes flying over the lake for looking at it.
106 posted on 05/14/2002 6:31:58 AM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion
Incidentally, this guy bought the lakeside property at a delinquent sale for $1000. The homeowners could have each coughed up $75 and done the same, if they had been a bit more vigilant. They missed their opportunity.

I'm wondering if the author of the piece got it right. Did he pay only $1000 or did he pay $1000 plus the outstanding taxes?

107 posted on 05/14/2002 6:32:18 AM PDT by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
It's called PRIVATE property for a reason.

Yes, give it back to the rightful owners - Indians!

108 posted on 05/14/2002 6:32:28 AM PDT by A. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: You are here
If you act with malice, you can expect malice in return.
109 posted on 05/14/2002 6:32:31 AM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
He can't charge airplanes flying over the lake for looking at it.

No, but he can build a roof over it, which is the whole point.

110 posted on 05/14/2002 6:32:52 AM PDT by Sloth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
You can build a fence to keep your dog in. You cannot build one to purposefully hurt your neighbor.

"Purposefully hurt your neighbor"? What kind of standard is that? What if he plants a row of trees to "purposefully hurt his neighbor"? Is that okay, and who gets to decide? You?

111 posted on 05/14/2002 6:32:55 AM PDT by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
The respect for private property rights seems to be a fickle thing 'round here, doesn't it?

How d'ya mean? So far it seems everybody agrees that ol' boy is a bit of an ass but he's within his legal rights so folks will just have to bite the bullet and get used to pink.

I think he should put up some plastic flamingoes too.

112 posted on 05/14/2002 6:32:58 AM PDT by maxwell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: luckyluke
Landlocked parcels are not permitted in any county in the United States. If the man has purchased a parcel that is not reachable by any access or easement, it can easily be condemned by the county.
113 posted on 05/14/2002 6:32:59 AM PDT by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
He had to pay to erect the fence so he could deny people the right to their view of the lake.

Yes, he had to pay for the fence, so what? What 'right' did these people have to a view of the lake? They enjoyed that view based on the good will of the developer. They never had a right to it. If they want a right to it, it now costs $30K.

114 posted on 05/14/2002 6:33:13 AM PDT by freedomcrusader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
Yes, give it back to the rightful owners - Indians!

Bwahaha...

115 posted on 05/14/2002 6:33:35 AM PDT by maxwell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
How about take one of the boards off the fence and get Mr. Connelly by the collar and then just beat the dog crap outa him with the board - it works.
116 posted on 05/14/2002 6:33:41 AM PDT by sandydipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
NIMBY! bwaahahahaha makes me lol to an extreme!!! |-D something tells me Mrs."Beaner" would go right along with the "fence" on something like the BWCA or any other "park" to keep people out,but when her sewage pond view is blocked,it's an outrage!!! heee heee,snicker,I love nimby's when they whine!!!

as far as the property owner vs. the lake owner,I'll stay on the fence on that part....(groan);-)

117 posted on 05/14/2002 6:33:53 AM PDT by Minnesoootan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sloth
Yes but if the roof blows off in a windstorm, he can't charge people to view the lake.
118 posted on 05/14/2002 6:35:32 AM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
He acted with malice to hurt the people around the lake in order to extort money from them.

Malice, maybe, but the fact is, he owns the land. If there are no restrictions that came with the land preventing his building a fence, then the reason he built it is immaterial. It may be a nuisance that lowers property values, and there may be some legal basis there on which they can act. I don't know.

But the fact remains, he can build a fence on his property to raise the value of it.

119 posted on 05/14/2002 6:35:40 AM PDT by freedomcrusader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: freedomcrusader
italics off - sorry!
120 posted on 05/14/2002 6:35:58 AM PDT by freedomcrusader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 1,141-1,147 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson