Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Amerigomag
The second step in the "ratification" process was bad enough, but the first was even more blatant. When the Yankee congress voted with a "2/3rds majority" to send this amendment to the states, no Southern state had suffrage in the Senate.

And of course Article V says "..No state, without its consent, shall be deprived of its equal suffrage in the Senate".

9 posted on 05/13/2002 6:51:35 PM PDT by H.Akston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: H.Akston
And of course Article V says "..No state, without its consent, shall be deprived of its equal suffrage in the Senate".

I believe three states have and continue to be deprived of representation in the Senate without their consent (any state which ratified the Seventeenth Amendment, and any state which joined after its ratification may be presumed to consent; IIRC three states have done neither).

13 posted on 05/13/2002 7:28:07 PM PDT by supercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson