Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NathanM
Don't forget, that the clause in this amendment which cancelled all debts for the emancipation of slaves was one of the first time the US Government blatantly took property without just compensation. Compensated emancipation for the LEGAL slaves which were to be freed, was the only just way to do it.

James Madison even said so.

http://www.jmu.edu/madison/emancslaves.htm

To provide a commensurate remedy for the evil, the plan must be extended to the great mass of blacks, and must embrace a fund sufficient to induce the master, as well as the slave, to concur in it. Without the concurrence of the master, the benefit will be very limited as it relates to the Negroes, and essentially defective as it relates to the United States; and the concurrence of masters must, for the most part, be obtained by purchase.

The 14th Amendment was one of the first times the US Government took property without just compensation, and they've been doing it ever since, with less and less qualms every year.

5 posted on 05/13/2002 6:33:41 PM PDT by H.Akston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: H.Akston
Don't forget, that the clause in this amendment which cancelled all debts for the emancipation of slaves was one of the first time the US Government blatantly took property without just compensation. Compensated emancipation for the LEGAL slaves which were to be freed, was the only just way to do it.

If the slaves were 'taken' by the federal government, the government would 'own' the slaves. This didn't happen - the slaves were freed, not taken. No compensation necessary.

96 posted on 05/18/2002 10:39:51 AM PDT by Diverdogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson