[ned]

Well, I read the Martin case. That was decided under the Americans with Disabilities Act.

In that sense, it was different than a lot of the 14th Amendment cases in which the judiciary finds that a state statute is unconstitutional. In Martin, the court was just applying a statute that was passed by Congress. For its part, Congress claimed it was acting under the constitutional authority granted to it by both the Fourteenth Amendment and the commerce clause.

[H.Akston]

Interesting.

Reminds me of the paragraph in :

http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a38ae1fc86628.htm

Titled: If You Liked the Commerce Power. . .