Can any Freepers please explain to me how the government can grant the right to sue and then ask that the case be summarily dismissed?
A plaintiff can ask for anything(e.g. a glass of water if they are thirsty) they want from the court, so can you. It's up to the judge to make a ruling on the motion, based on their filing and your response to it.
From the case filed in District Court, Civil No. 02-152-CV-W-3, the United States Attorney for the defendants "move the Court, pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil P 12(b) (1) and (6), for an order dismissing this action, or in the alternative, granting summary judgement.
The plaintiff filing a motion to dismiss under rule 12(b) is the standard opening move of virtually any civil suit. It is up to you to respond to the motion within a certain time as to why their arguments and conclusion are full of it and such a motion should be denied.
What was your response, and what if anything has the court ruled on the motion to dismiss? The plaintiff merely filing a motion does not end the case. The judge's ruling in regard to that motion is what controls.
So what happened after the government's 12(b) motion was submitted. What was your response? What is the status of the 10th Circuit Appeal the plaintiff mentioned in their motion?
What was the court's subsequent ruling if any? I don't see anything of that in your posting. So what is it that you expect anyone to comment on?
What are you looking for? If it's legal advice, better get a good lawyer, if its just Freeper opinions, its hard to see what can be said on the basis of what you have posted or what relevance such would have in regards your case[s?]. Looks to me that you would be better served by consulting with a good civil lawyer.
But I'm no expert on paying taxes, as mine are always overdue!