Replies

Yeah, a thread such as this one brings out all the
anti-Bush screamers. They lay there, waiting until they
find just the right article that makes Bush look bad,
then they strike. It just tickles them pink! Just look
at all of them on here today, you know, the usual sus-
pects. I have heard just the opposite.

Not long after Sept. 11, I read that they were
tightening the borders. They were going after terror-
ists. Then they got around to talking about the bor-
ders again. It seems to me that Bush said something
about letting families of immigrants complete their nat-
uralization process without going back to their country
of origin.

I may have it a little mixed up, but he said
he was going to let this all go on a case-by-case basis.
It wasn't supposed to involve a really large group of
people. But all of a sudden, people are flying off the
handle. And just because a 'conservative' congressman
picks a bone publicly with the president about it, these
people come out screaming that the Bush administration
is going against conservatives, that he is selling them
out. That because he is disagreeing with said conserv-
ative, he mustn't be a real conservative, he is really a
liberal, socialist, one-world-order, take your pick!

It doesn't seem to matter whether it is a Democrat or
or a Republican. When old Senator Robert Byrd recently
voted against an immigration bill, of some sort,
these same people were hanging all over him, drooling.
That makes me wonder what kind of people these people
are!

Yeah, a thread such as this one brings out all the anti-Bush screamers. They lay there, waiting until they find just the right article that makes Bush look bad, then they strike. It just tickles them pink! Just look at all of them on here today, you know, the usual sus- pects. I have heard just the opposite.

Funny thing is...we never have to wait long. Every day there seems to be some more anti-conservative policy eminating from the white house. And we don't have to lay around much either. As a matter of fact I've been having trouble keeping up with all the un-conservative crap he's been pulling.

A more accurate statement may have been ..They run around, trying to hit upon all the threads that seem to paint Bush badly in the hopeless quest for some vindication for voting for him.

Not long after Sept. 11, I read that they were tightening the borders. They were going after terror- ists. Then they got around to talking about the bor- ders again. It seems to me that Bush said something about letting families of immigrants complete their nat- uralization process without going back to their country of origin.

Never tightened the borders. Only went after terrorists over-seas. The domestic terrorists seem pretty well unaffected by the "crack-down". He did say something about "families" but it was a smoke screen.

I may have it a little mixed up, but he said he was going to let this all go on a case-by-case basis. It wasn't supposed to involve a really large group of people. But all of a sudden, people are flying off the handle. And just because a 'conservative' congressman picks a bone publicly with the president about it, these people come out screaming that the Bush administration is going against conservatives, that he is selling them out. That because he is disagreeing with said conserv- ative, he mustn't be a real conservative, he is really a liberal, socialist, one-world-order, take your pick!

You were lied to. It was aimed at large numbers of people. Bush is going against conservatives. He's not a real conservative. He supports "amnesty", BIGGER GUBMENT, more fed intrusion into schools, more foriegn "aid", more corporate welfare ect. ect. the list goes on and on. Take your pick.

It doesn't seem to matter whether it is a Democrat or or a Republican. When old Senator Robert Byrd recently voted against an immigration bill, of some sort, these same people were hanging all over him, drooling. That makes me wonder what kind of people these people are!

That's because we don't base our praise or scorn on the simple equation R = Right. Bush has sold us out so many times recently that to even hint that he's a conservative brings instand scorn and howling. And rightly so IMO.

EBUCK

It seems to me that Bush said something about letting families of immigrants complete their nat- uralization process without going back to their country of origin.

I may have it a little mixed up, but he said he was going to let this all go on a case-by-case basis. It wasn't supposed to involve a really large group of people.

You are correct, you have it mixed up.
What Bush had inserted (at the last minute) into the House version of the Homeland Defense Bill was a mini-Amnesty for at least 200,000 Illegals. The timing coincided with his visit with Vicente Fox in Monterrey, Mexico.
Check out the legislation...

AMNESTY by BUSH
The Truth About Section 245(i)