Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Teacher317; Amelia; No Truce With Kings
"I think I might be one of those, until someone can explain to me why a person's private conversations should be monitored by our nanny-state."

Then, you haven't been paying attention in class, teacher. It has been established that terrorists are rather fond of using their lawyers to funnel information out of prison to other terrorists to use in terrorist activities. These recordings cannot be used by, cannot even be shared with, prosecutors unless these recordings contain information of a conspiracy to committ future terrorist acts.

You see, without this law, a terrorist could name any outside plotter as his attorney and use that person to convey any information he desired.

And, prior to the enactment of this statute, all communications were monitored except those involving an attorney for all prisoners. I suspose you have a problem with drug lords running drug rings from inside prison too?

15 posted on 05/11/2002 2:48:26 PM PDT by DugwayDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: DugwayDuke
I su[p]pose you [don't] have a problem with drug lords running drug rings from inside prison too?

(I assume my corrections are proper.) Yes, of course I have a problem with prisoners committing illegal acts, just as I have a problem with free citizens committing illegal acts. However, just because someone MIGHT be committing an illegal act does not mean that we should rescind our Rights in the hopes of making the job of the police easier. (We should do that in hundreds of others ways, but not this one.) If we do, then it is a short hop to say that since the freed drug dealers use the phone to do their deals, the police should monitor those calls as well. Then, of course, those who are suspected of other crimes will be similarly monitored... simply put, it's a bad idea. It assumes that all of those conversations contain illegal activity, without any proof beforehand. Let's find other ways to police them... ways that won't restrict the rights of those who are not committing crimes, and that won't erode the concept of 'innocent until proven guilty'. (How about punishing those lawyers who make relay communications, for example?)

(Yes, I am aware that those in prison have been convicted of something already... that does not mean that their every action forevermore will be an illegal one. The guards do not have the right to monitor their conversations, no matter how vile and heinous the dirt-bag might be.)

20 posted on 05/11/2002 6:31:04 PM PDT by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: DugwayDuke
Exactly. That anti-american piece of filth that was arrested in NY willingly passed information and instructions to terrorists and became an accessory to crime.
47 posted on 05/13/2002 7:42:01 AM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson