Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: forest
Here, in a nutshell, is the hypocrisy of the 'Ashcroft decision':

-- the Solicitor General requested the Supreme Court to turn down the appeal.
If the government keeps control over our "right" to keep and bear arms, that right, then, becomes degraded to but a privilege.
It was the intent of the Founding Fathers that the American people shall have the unequivocal right to keep and bear arms and that government "shall not" interfere with that right.

Thus, we see that the Bush administration IS attempting to 'interfere', by urging the USSC to ignore the Emerson appeal.

Incredibly, many here at FR are swallowing this 'line', as a great stand on principle. -- It is not. -- It is a political ploy, a call for 'business as usual'. - With a sugar tit coating of platitudes for us gun nuts.

4 posted on 05/11/2002 10:59:26 AM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: tpaine
A test of the government's sincerity is probably the regulations concerning pilots and screening of passengers. Gun laws also involve natural law and the ability of self- preservation.

Power and the ability to lose that power due to an armed, aroused, citizenry has more bearing on your average politician than any rights involved.

The street gangs have helped create the conditions for gun control in the cities, but it is the personal responsibility for individuals to protect themselves instead of leaving that duty to law enforcement.

9 posted on 05/11/2002 11:22:44 AM PDT by meenie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson