EMERSON & THE SECOND AMENDMENT

Fiedor Report On the News #272 ^ | 5-12-02 | Doug Fiedor

[Neil E. Wright]

So jackassforever sounds off again. ..... Hey Jerkoff ... got news for you ... my fondness for firearms has nothing to do with my sexual prowess ... If you are misreading Fraud thats your problem ... not mine .. Next!!!!

Toward FREEDOM

[Texasforever]

So jackassforever sounds off again. ..... Hey Jerkoff ... got news for you ... my fondness for firearms has nothing to do with my sexual prowess ... If you are misreading Fraud thats your problem ... not mine .. Next!!!!

Well given your obsession with "jerkoff" I does seem that your sexual "prowess" seems to revolve around your right hand. But then again, maybe you need the Joslyn Elder short course.

[Neil E. Wright]

And still you won't respond with a straight answer to a straight question.

Typical bullshit from the statists.

You assholes bore me. Time to do something more constructive, like maybe watch mold grow on my shower walls.

Toward FREEDOM

[Texasforever]

And still you won't respond with a straight answer to a straight question

What question? I think you are smoking that mold on your bathroom wall.

[Texasforever]

I did not push the button on Neil.

[Roscoe]

Adios.

[Abundy]

BATF???Idiots??? LMAO

Hey, notice I included a field in that list...I figure if there's no one around I can't hurt anybody...

Of course a joking post is always hard to pick up on FR...obviously I wouldn't mix alcohol and a mortar...

[Abundy]

You think Congress is a judicial body?

No I don't...misread your post. Guess I'm not used to you actually making sense or telling the truth. But hey, a blind squirrel finds a nut every now and then.

[Abundy]

Jim's posting guidelines say no personal attacks

Hell, 90% of the posts on this forum are personal attacks, either outright or through thinly veiled "rhetoric." Have you ever been to a WOD thread?

I noticed you went right after tpaine and ignored TexasForever's numerous personal attacks...can we all get that list of the "Untouchables" so we don't end up bothering you moderators with abuse notifications that won't amount to anything?

[Abundy]

Are you allowed private personal target practice?

Are you allowed to think for yourself? Or are you required to get permission from your masters in DC prior to wiping your @ss?

You really ought to change your screenname, had the Alamo been womaned by individuals like you they would have surrendered without firing a shot.

I figured you out...you are a Frenchman living in Texas????

Don't bother replying...I thought your first post to me was a joke in response to a post that was truly intended as humor...obviously it is you who are the joke.

[philman_36]

However in Texas guns are just tools NOT measure of manhood.
Oh really? You've indicated otherwise before, showing that at one time or another you've changed your position. My, how some things do and don't change in the course of two days, and how soon you forget.

Hey Laz...your "little buddy" is making more "nicknames for Richard" comparisons again.
As I said, I'm the only one who'll take what you said to heart. I've made no comments at all for two days. Where are you to jump on him and correct him?
Ample evidence again, "Tex", that you're no gentleman.

[philman_36]

It is ridiculous to have to explain this to a supposedly adult man.
Calling someone else a child now I see.
You're so predictable and repetitive.

[philman_36]

I have yet to see you "rip" anyone. You are too busy drooling. However, I will defend your right to try it with me at any time. So have at it.
And another challenge. Definitely repetitive. This is just a carbon copy of the other day with someone else! You're also transparent.
You're really getting to be too much.

[philman_36]

Texasforever...Look prick, I asked a question and got an answer.
Admin Moderator...Jim's posting guidelines say no personal attacks. So knock it off.
tpaine...BTW, you might take a glance at #277
I wholeheartedly agree with tpaine! Where are your admonishments, Admin Moderator, to Texasforever who has repeatedly done just that on this and multiple other threads?

[philman_36]

Friend, that would get you an ass kicking anywhere in the city.
And you're just the one to administer it too, aren't you "Tex".

[The Raven]

Related reading

[philman_36]

So here, ladies and gentlemen, is Texasforever in all of his true "glory". Name calling, personal attacks, "calling someone out", sexual innuendo, and so many other things it isn't even funny.
Multiple, repeated replys all showing the same repetitive "skills" and I'm sure it will all be the same again tomorrow, next week, next month and next year. Having been on the receiving end of the diatribes for some time I know of which I speak.
And the band plays on...

Good day, to one and all.

[harpseal]

A couple of historical points. First, the Miller decision was only dealing with possession of a short barreled shotgun. There were no arguments made for Miller as only the United States gfovernment presented argumants in the case. The Court ruled that in the absence of any evidence linking possession of a sawed off shotgun to a militia the tax law was upheld. Now machine guns were used extensively in World War I. It was to deal with the carnage of machine guns that the tank was developed. You are correct about short barreled shotguns being used in the trenches. The Gatling gun was used in the American Civil War. The US Army used machine guns during the Spanish American War and in the relief of Peking at the turn of the Century. Likewise machine guns were used in the pursuit of Pancho Villa by General Pershing's troops.

The modern machine gun was invented by Hiram Maxim in the 1880's. The Maxim guns were extensively employed by British colonial forces in the latter part of the 19th Century.

In fact the Gavernments choice of US vs Miller as the test case for the NFA was probably cynically chosen to not include a machine gun.

Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown