Skip to comments.
EMERSON & THE SECOND AMENDMENT
Fiedor Report On the News #272 ^
| 5-12-02
| Doug Fiedor
Posted on 05/11/2002 10:23:17 AM PDT by forest
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280, 281-300, 301-320 ... 361-368 next last
To: Texasforever
So jackassforever sounds off again. ..... Hey Jerkoff ... got news for you ... my fondness for firearms has nothing to do with my sexual prowess ... If you are misreading Fraud thats your problem ... not mine .. Next!!!!
Toward FREEDOM
To: Neil E. Wright
So jackassforever sounds off again. ..... Hey Jerkoff ... got news for you ... my fondness for firearms has nothing to do with my sexual prowess ... If you are misreading Fraud thats your problem ... not mine .. Next!!!! Well given your obsession with "jerkoff" I does seem that your sexual "prowess" seems to revolve around your right hand. But then again, maybe you need the Joslyn Elder short course.
Comment #283 Removed by Moderator
Comment #284 Removed by Moderator
To: Texasforever
And still you won't respond with a straight answer to a straight question.
Typical bullshit from the statists.
You assholes bore me. Time to do something more constructive, like maybe watch mold grow on my shower walls.
Toward FREEDOM
To: Neil E. Wright
And still you won't respond with a straight answer to a straight question What question? I think you are smoking that mold on your bathroom wall.
To: all
I did not push the button on Neil.
To: Neil E. Wright
Adios.
288
posted on
05/14/2002 1:29:23 AM PDT
by
Roscoe
To: Poohbah
BATF???Idiots??? LMAO
Hey, notice I included a field in that list...I figure if there's no one around I can't hurt anybody...
Of course a joking post is always hard to pick up on FR...obviously I wouldn't mix alcohol and a mortar...
289
posted on
05/14/2002 2:54:04 AM PDT
by
Abundy
To: Roscoe
You think Congress is a judicial body?
No I don't...misread your post. Guess I'm not used to you actually making sense or telling the truth. But hey, a blind squirrel finds a nut every now and then.
290
posted on
05/14/2002 3:02:12 AM PDT
by
Abundy
To: Admin Moderator; tpaine
Jim's posting guidelines say no personal attacks
Hell, 90% of the posts on this forum are personal attacks, either outright or through thinly veiled "rhetoric." Have you ever been to a WOD thread?
I noticed you went right after tpaine and ignored TexasForever's numerous personal attacks...can we all get that list of the "Untouchables" so we don't end up bothering you moderators with abuse notifications that won't amount to anything?
291
posted on
05/14/2002 3:05:53 AM PDT
by
Abundy
To: Texasforever
Are you allowed private personal target practice?
Are you allowed to think for yourself? Or are you required to get permission from your masters in DC prior to wiping your @ss?
You really ought to change your screenname, had the Alamo been womaned by individuals like you they would have surrendered without firing a shot.
I figured you out...you are a Frenchman living in Texas????
Don't bother replying...I thought your first post to me was a joke in response to a post that was truly intended as humor...obviously it is you who are the joke.
292
posted on
05/14/2002 3:10:03 AM PDT
by
Abundy
To: Texasforever; EricOKC; Lazamataz
However in Texas guns are just tools NOT measure of manhood.Oh really? You've indicated otherwise before, showing that at one time or another you've changed your position. My, how
some things do and don't change in the course of two days, and how soon you forget.
Hey Laz...your "little buddy" is making more "nicknames for Richard" comparisons again.
As I said, I'm the only one who'll take what you said to heart. I've made no comments at all for two days. Where are you to jump on him and correct him?
Ample evidence again, "Tex", that you're no gentleman.
To: Texasforever
It is ridiculous to have to explain this to a supposedly adult man.
Calling someone else a child now I see.
You're so predictable and repetitive.
To: Texasforever; tpaine
I have yet to see you "rip" anyone. You are too busy drooling. However, I will defend your right to try it with me at any time. So have at it.
And another challenge. Definitely repetitive. This is just a carbon copy of the other day with someone else! You're also transparent.
You're really getting to be too much.
To: tpaine; Admin Moderator; Texasforever
Texasforever...Look prick, I asked a question and got an answer.
Admin Moderator...Jim's posting guidelines say no personal attacks. So knock it off.
tpaine...BTW, you might take a glance at #277
I wholeheartedly agree with tpaine! Where are your admonishments, Admin Moderator, to Texasforever who has repeatedly done just that on this and multiple other threads?
To: Texasforever
Friend, that would get you an ass kicking anywhere in the city.
And you're just the one to administer it too, aren't you "Tex".
To: forest
To: all
So here, ladies and gentlemen, is Texasforever in all of his true "glory". Name calling, personal attacks, "calling someone out", sexual innuendo, and so many other things it isn't even funny.
Multiple, repeated replys all showing the same repetitive "skills" and I'm sure it will all be the same again tomorrow, next week, next month and next year. Having been on the receiving end of the diatribes for some time I know of which I speak.
And the band plays on...
Good day, to one and all.
To: Drammach
A couple of historical points. First, the Miller decision was only dealing with possession of a short barreled shotgun. There were no arguments made for Miller as only the United States gfovernment presented argumants in the case. The Court ruled that in the absence of any evidence linking possession of a sawed off shotgun to a militia the tax law was upheld. Now machine guns were used extensively in World War I. It was to deal with the carnage of machine guns that the tank was developed. You are correct about short barreled shotguns being used in the trenches. The Gatling gun was used in the American Civil War. The US Army used machine guns during the Spanish American War and in the relief of Peking at the turn of the Century. Likewise machine guns were used in the pursuit of Pancho Villa by General Pershing's troops.
The modern machine gun was invented by Hiram Maxim in the 1880's. The Maxim guns were extensively employed by British colonial forces in the latter part of the 19th Century.
In fact the Gavernments choice of US vs Miller as the test case for the NFA was probably cynically chosen to not include a machine gun.
Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280, 281-300, 301-320 ... 361-368 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson