Take what someone says, stretch it into what she didn't say and then ridicule her for it.A real journalist, or a person with a shred of intellectual honesty -- of which Charles Utwater II has NONE -- would publish the pertinant quotes and let the reader decide. He starts by saying "Let's take this smear step by step". Yet somehow, curiously, he dances ever so gingerly around the actual quotes she uttered:
- "We know there were numerous warnings of the events to come on September 11th. ... What did this administration know and when did it know it, about the events of September 11th? Who else knew, and why did they not warn the innocent people of New York who were needlessly murdered? ... What do they have to hide?"
- "persons close to this administration are poised to make huge profits off America's new war."
- "I am not aware of any evidence showing that President Bush or members of his administration have personally profited from the attacks of 9-11. A complete investigation might reveal that to be the case."
Now who are you going to believe? Charles Utwater II, or your LYING EYES?
Charles Utwater II is the worst c*********g m***********g G**-d****** b***h son of a wh*** piece of s*** in online 'journalism'.
Laz, you have to understand that this is some angry leftist who has put up a website and called it a "blog". This grants him "instant legitimacy" in the eyes of the Trendy Left.
Remember, our Mr. Utwater (the "Second") is still in traumatic denial over the 2000 election, as well.
Be Seeing You,
Chris