Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gcruse
Exactly, the arabs can't even beat each other in a war so they want the one who slapped them down to give them back what they lost in the war they started. The Foggy Bottom boys who think this is reasonable need to be standing in unemployment lines back in their home states.

Funny, but I always thought of W as all hat, no cattle. The nautical equivalent is just as good. Thanks for posting it.

56 posted on 05/11/2002 9:18:42 AM PDT by Twodees
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: Twodees
"Funny, but I always thought of W as all hat, no cattle. The nautical equivalent is just as good. "

Actually, the expressions do not mean the same. I believe all hat, no cattle, means someone who talks a good game, but does not have the wherewithal to back up what they are saying. In the case of 'all sail, no anchor,' the person is said to lack strongly held beliefs (think moral clarity) and is thus buffeted about by every change in the breeze. In the case of Bush, he told us during the campaign that he would get good advisors and rely on them. Which he did. But now the advisors are disagreeing, and Bush is waffling because the direction he needs to go is not being generated by strongly held values.

60 posted on 05/11/2002 10:46:24 AM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson