To: codebreaker
Now I would like this to be true as much as the other guy, but come on...The National Enquirer is hardly a reputable news source....
40 posted on
05/10/2002 9:43:35 AM PDT by
newcats
To: newcats
The National Enquirer is hardly a reputable news source....Not True, Kimosabi. They broke most of the Jesse stuff, and their lawyers are VERY careful....
This could very well be true.
To: newcats
One of Bill Clinton's attorneys is also counsel to the "National Enquirer"; maybe Clinton 'forgot' to pay some legal bills.
To: newcats
I think National Enquirer's info is reliable
after Carol Burnett sued it for one million for libel back in '80s (and won)
my friend Jill wrote a free-lance article for them on what to do with left-overs (various recipes)
she had to get 3 sources to attest to the truth of what she wrote
she was living in Manhattan then and went to NYU, Columbia U, and another place
and had their nutrition departments vouch for what she wrote
Love, Palo
To: newcats
That was before the Toon's administration made even them a reputable news source, remember they were the first to break the story about Monica.
135 posted on
05/11/2002 10:34:15 AM PDT by
Smittie
To: newcats
The National Enquirer is a whole lot better than anything else we have in this country as far as investigations go. They find out a lot more than most of our "prestigious" newspapers. They've come up from the pink sheet they were when I was younger. Don't discount them just yet.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson