Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mind-numbed Robot
Could it be for the same reason they emphasis "the state shall not establish a religion" and then ignore the rest of the sentence, "nor prevent the free exercise thereof"? Could it be that the Constitution restricts their plans to change our form of government?

B I N G O

If they want to change the Constitution, then pass a new Amendment. The formal procedure is very well explained.

28 posted on 05/09/2002 7:29:33 AM PDT by Hunble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Hunble
If they want to change the Constitution, then pass a new Amendment. The formal procedure is very well explained.

Not to go off on a tangent, but the Bill of Rights can not be changed. The Constitution can not be ammended in a way that negates Amendments 1-10. This was understood for hundreds of years.

66 posted on 05/09/2002 8:15:13 AM PDT by FreeTally
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson