Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sneakypete;patriciaruth
You are letting your knee-jerk biases overpower your common sense. I can think of no better case than one where the person has been arrested,had his Constitutional rights violated, and had his property confiscated without him ever being found guilty of anything.

Note also that he was acquitted of all domestic violence charges. The only "crime" of which he has not been acquitted is his excercise of his right to keep and bear arms.

274 posted on 05/09/2002 9:15:20 PM PDT by supercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies ]


To: supercat
Note also that he was acquitted of all domestic violence charges. The only "crime" of which he has not been acquitted is his excercise of his right to keep and bear arms.

AND that it is because of THIS conviction that it is now a violation of federal law for him to even again own or be in possession of a firearm. Kinda ironic,ain't it?

BTW,this is one of the biggest reasons I'd like to see the Supremes take this case on. There is no way in hell they could possibly approve of a circular firing squad like this being Constitutional.

275 posted on 05/10/2002 12:40:39 AM PDT by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson