Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Millburn Drysdale
Indeed, every well-run military establishment is always gaming scenarios against probable, possible and even unlikely enemies. It was the Russians failure to continue to do this after 1910 that resulted in the Tsar facing a decision in 1914 to either (1) mobilize against both Germany and Austria or (2) do nothing. Had Russian plans (which existed up to 1910) to mobilize against Austria, but not Germany, been up to date, that is the path the Tsar would have followed. Had that happened, the consensus of informed opinion is that a general European war would likely then have been avoided, because the Germans would not have had to put their Schlieffen Plan into effect.
5 posted on 05/08/2002 6:40:39 AM PDT by CatoRenasci
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: CatoRenasci
every well-run military establishment is always gaming scenarios against probable, possible and even unlikely enemies.

A few years ago I read about the British war plan against the US drawn up before WWI.
The main thrust was an amphibious landing near New Bedford and a northward trust to isolate Eastern New England and envelope Boston.

28 posted on 05/08/2002 7:40:20 AM PDT by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson