People who use insults are saying they have no substance to refute statements that are made.
Anyone who does an overview of bush's domestic policies can only come to one conclusion and that is that he has embraced the dem's policies. To do otherwise is defending the indefensible.
Personal attacks do not strenghten an argument, rather, it shows a weakness. Those are clinton's type replies.
Unfortunately, a shallow, simple analysis of the Bush Administrations' actions of late, leads to the undeniable truth that his ship is missing a rudder.
You may think it Bush "bashing," but the observant ones in this crowd will recognize it for the truth... Nice try...
bloated education bills
campaign finance reform
free trade
illegal aliens being legalized
spending more money all around
increasing the size of the federal govt (through airport screeners, etc.)
practically backing Arafat/PLO over Israel
If that was Al Gore's first year or so in office, you would be screaming your head off and the liberals would be happy. It's Bush's first year or so in office and it's okay.
Please explain the double standard.