Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mardi Gras Party Priest Resigns
The Smoking Gun ^ | May 7, 2002

Posted on 05/07/2002 12:09:14 PM PDT by Armando Guerra

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-105 next last
To: Armando Guerra
I do believe this Pope has not been as forceful as he could be.

Please see my post at # 20.

21 posted on 05/07/2002 1:01:37 PM PDT by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Armando Guerra
I agree! The reason I used "Pedophile" is because in many cases that is exactly what it was. And I also agree that it is a gay issue at the core.
22 posted on 05/07/2002 1:05:13 PM PDT by Icthus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Orual
In this photo I would be willing to bet any amount of money Calvin Coolidge was wearing the black armband as a sign of mourning for the death of President Harding, whom he succeeded in office. Wearing a black armband has been a traditional sign of mourning for centuries, and was especially popular in the United States from the early 19th century until the early to mid 20th century.
23 posted on 05/07/2002 1:06:38 PM PDT by Florida SunGod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Armando Guerra
Same as these - decoration and protection. They're chic and practical!


24 posted on 05/07/2002 1:07:25 PM PDT by Xenalyte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox
When they have cleaned up their acts, God will reward the Church with an abundance of good men who will have at their heart to serve God faithfully. Our Holy Father said one time that there are many young people who are looking to priests to show them the way to Christ and that these young people would joyfully enter the service of the Lord if they are shown a proper example.

I agree. Already, the most orthodox Catholic Churches are the ones having no trouble filling the seminaries and convents and have the pews full on Sundays.

25 posted on 05/07/2002 1:07:50 PM PDT by Armando Guerra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: PoisedWoman
Being a pedophile is not inherently a "gay" offense. In fact, many offenders are otherwise "straight". Homophobic labeling of all "gays" as perverse and a threat to boys as being de facto sexual predators is small minded and incongruent with the facts.
26 posted on 05/07/2002 1:10:27 PM PDT by Florida SunGod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Armando Guerra
I think the real problem may have been that blonde babe in front of him.
27 posted on 05/07/2002 1:17:06 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Florida SunGod
Being a pedophile is not inherently a "gay" offense. In fact, many offenders are otherwise "straight".

From my recollection, about 95% of the priest "incidents" involved male priests and young BOYS. It would therefore seem that if we got rid of priests who have an attaction for young BOYS, then the problems would be greatly reduced

28 posted on 05/07/2002 1:18:28 PM PDT by SauronOfMordor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Florida SunGod
New York Catholic Rod Dreher, an editor of National Review Online, addressed the issue in an April 22 editorial, “The Gay Question: Amid the Catholic Church’s Current Scandals, an Un-Ignorable Issue.” He informed readers:

“Stephen Rubino, a New Jersey lawyer, says that of the over 300 alleged victims of priest sex abuse he has represented, roughly 85% are boys, and were teenagers when the abuse occurred. Dr. Richard Fitzgibbons, an eminent Catholic psychiatrist who has treated scores of victims and priest-perpetrators, says 90% of his patients were either teen male victims of priests, or priests who abused teen boys....

The reluctance of bishops — and the general public — to address this issue, Dreher suggests, “arises, no doubt, partly out of a fear of antagonizing homosexual anti-defamation groups, who resent the stereotype of male homosexuals as pederasts. It’s much safer to focus inquiry on the question of mandatory celibacy, or the issue of ordaining women. Yet it defies common sense to imagine that an ordinary man, having made a vow not to marry, is therefore going to be sexually attracted to boys.

29 posted on 05/07/2002 1:24:04 PM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Florida SunGod
Homophobic labeling of all "gays" as perverse...

Take a good look. This is what homosexuals march in and shout from the roof tops as "PRIDE."

And the little PC lables like "Homophobic" work well with the easily intimidated and the weak minded. They don't work here.

30 posted on 05/07/2002 1:30:13 PM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Florida SunGod
Homophobic labeling of all "gays" as perverse and a threat to boys as being de facto sexual predators is small minded and incongruent with the facts.

Nice of you to join us today. Where have you been? Down on Bourbon Street hanging out with the Mardi Gras priest? Or just out in the sun too long?

31 posted on 05/07/2002 1:32:43 PM PDT by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: nimc; *Catholic_list
This guy is cruisin'; and, I am guessing, but the black arm band is what he's lookin' for. Disgusting, perverted creep! They all need to be excommunicated! To infiltrate the priesthood with less than noble reasons is the worst. IMHO, they are lower than pond scum. God is delivering them up to their own depravities.[Rom 1:26]
32 posted on 05/07/2002 1:33:27 PM PDT by ThomasMore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Florida SunGod
Or for his son, Calvin, who died aged 16 in the Summer of 1924.
33 posted on 05/07/2002 1:56:20 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Armando Guerra

"Ecce homo!"

34 posted on 05/07/2002 2:07:10 PM PDT by Charles Henrickson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: geaux
So this is a Catholic Priest preparing for the holy season of Lent? Antone who doesn't think the Churh's current problems are at root a homosexual problem have their haeads in the sand. This makes me sick.
35 posted on 05/07/2002 2:13:45 PM PDT by pgkdan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan
This makes me sick.

It also apparently prevents me from hitting the preview button prior to posting. Sorry.

36 posted on 05/07/2002 2:18:48 PM PDT by pgkdan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Orual
He appears to be silent on the issue.
37 posted on 05/07/2002 2:47:31 PM PDT by El Sordo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ThomasMore; Askel5
IMHO, they are lower than pond scum.

You know, Tom...as much as the photo of Bouterie disgusts and depresses me, there's something else in the photo (the first one, I mean) that's just as bad. See them? The straight couple on the left? The woman thinks it's cute and funny; the guy's probably seen enough already and wants to mosey back above St. Peter Street where he's counting on seeing college chicks flashing their tits. They're both nice middle Americans -- sexual tourists -- whose tolerant appetite and enjoyment of the fare offered up makes them complicit in the whole squalid scene. They don't even have the excuse of a psychological disorder; they're just suckers who've been shaped and conditioned by the porno culture in which we're all made to swim.

38 posted on 05/07/2002 3:07:16 PM PDT by Romulus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan
It makes me sick too; as it would most of his parishoners, I would bet. WHO would shrug at seeing the priest who hears their confessions, celebrates Mass, and who is supposed to be Christ's representative, putting himself on display for other men? In the first picture he looks just like every other homosexual advertising his 'studliness'. It's the second one that is damning, IMO. Angle of the camera or not, it looks like he's about to pat the behind of the man on the right. It's the fact that he looks VERY much like the other strutting gay 'studs' that is disgusting. He looks very comfortable in those candid pics.
He looks like he's lookin' for something, and it AIN'T 'souls for Jesus'!
I grew up right on the fringes of the Quarter, went to Bourbon & Royal St's every Mardi Gras for about 30 years. Even took in the 'famous' gay costume contest, and I would bet anything that this 'priest' is 100% homosexual.He and others like him have NO PLACE in the clergy! Shame them out, scare them out,drag them out, force them out! I wouldn't want the sacraments from a known homosexual priest. I wouldn't attend a Mass celebrated by a known homosexual priest, and I will NO LONGER give my donations to a church that harbors them. How many others feel the same way?
My religion and my faith in it is strong, it's the perverts and evil people IN it who should, and MUST, be rejected.
39 posted on 05/07/2002 3:30:25 PM PDT by ClearBlueSky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Armando Guerra
Shockin'! Next, we'll discover Jesus consorted with whores and publicans! (That's publicans, not 'publicans; Jesus had some class.)
40 posted on 05/07/2002 4:29:57 PM PDT by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-105 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson