Well, I don't understand it, but remembering that there is always a reason, I will wait and see. I have learned that first of all you have to find out if this is the TRUTH, or just another helpful leak from Clintonistas.
And people who think Clinton won't milk this and the press won't cover it are off their rockers. The press loves Clinton. They will cover every second of it.
Of course, the article then goes on to say that Clinton sent Bush41 to two places to attend funerals. In any event, IMHO, this was a very inappropriate move on the part of the Bush administration. Sort of like a frat boy trick. Hate to say it but that's my take on it.
Good point, Miss Marple. This may not be as it seems. It is always wise to wait for the truth.
In the mean time, I'm off this thread. There are reasonable concerns for sure, but I'm not subjecting myself to the wholesale bashing of the hateful nasty ones that goes on in places like this. It's not worth sorting through the garbage to find the intelligent comments on either side.
Well Clinton is no Carter. And Carter certainly wasn't the major league CRIMINAL that Clinton IS (by any definition).
Well, I don't understand it, but remembering that there is always a reason, I will wait and see.
Like you are waiting with regards to Chinagate, Filegate, Emailgate, the Riady non-refund, the death of Foster, the death of Brown, etc. etc. etc. etc. etc?
I suspect you'll still be waiting when 'you know what' freezes over.