Seriously, read again what I quoted you saying above and tell me who is more akin to being a member of the thought police. I've no right, but you've got every right. Now, perhaps you can explain exactly how it is that you can say that, unless you are somehow better than I, or your thinking is somehow more worthy for consideration than mine is. Explain please.
"I've no more right to act as a spokesman for Ozzy than you've the right to pass judgement on him ..."
Right there, you are telling me I have no right to pass judgment on Ozzie the Ork. Judgment of him takes place in the mind. Therefore, you are telling me I have no right to think negative thoughts about O.O. You can't stop what I think and what I believe.
This is the mentality of which the 'thought police' are made of.
BTW, acting as a spokesman for O.O. would be a legal contract with O.O., which you don't have. Passing judgement on a person, last time I checked, does not require a legal document (I'm sure the thought police would like it that way).
Analyzing the responses on this thread, I surmise that people have more problem with my freedom to judge others than my critisism of Ozzie the Ork. I think we all can agree his 'act' is full of vulgar language, base, tribal music, all with an intentionally satanic twist.
One of the main points of contention which set off the '60's youth rebellion was the fact the youth of that day did not like adults judging their sexual promiscuousness. This attitude continues to this day.
It is right to judge, to be discriminating, and to analyze everything in our lives. Only fools and idiots do not judge.