Right. In BJ's case, her conclusions always fall to one side of the spectrum, regardless of the situation. I do not think that all conspiracy theories are false. People conspire secretly and systematically sometimes at the horrendous cost to others. But when you see people attributing to these conspirators enormous ability of planning a scheme which will require the near-perfect prediction of outcome, and power to control every power players and resources, I become really skeptical. She routinely confuses opportunistic exploitation of events with preplanned deliberate plans, or reckless handling of proxy groups with part of elaborate subversion.
One such example is her claim that US created N. Korean nuke situations so that American company can sell a $1bn nuclear reactor to N. Korea. Another example is that WTC attack and Iraqi invasion are planned just to get the control of oil only. These are enormous risk to take if they just do it for oils. If these purported operations backfire, oil companies are the least of the concern. If there is oil interest angle, it is that, now that OBL attacked, oil interest is exploiting it to this full advantage. But that is not satisfying enough to some folks. They see 9/11 and others preplanned meticulously.