Don't lie.
I was on BJ's ping list and read every post. BJ went well above and beyond that -- way beyond. BJ was no different than any marxist commie conspiracy theorist of the last 30 years and then went on some.
What's wrong with you?
In one thread not long ago, BJ(is she, according to her !) speculated that the power-that-be planted the story of Iraqi involvement in OKC bombing on Sherman Skolinic(sp?) site, one of well-known conspiracy theory site. So that it can drum up support on Iraqi invasion. That sounded really ludicrous to me because the site has limited reach even for spreading credible allegations. There are other sites which has much wider reach, including Drudge's site.
She implore that we do not fall into this trap. She was categorically ruling out any possibility of Iraq's involvements. Her argument is that Iraq is innocent, Saudi is all guilty. American should not invade Iraq but America would never attack Saudi. She never advocated taking any action against Saudi in terms of military and economic means. As always, her story boils down to taking out corrupt elements in America, but doing nothing to foreign enemies, be it Saudi or Iraqi, who allied with such domestic elements. It is either unethical or impossible. She apparently winces at people discussing miliary scenario against potential enemies. I ran into it once either in China/Taiwan thread. I and another guy, zog, were discussing possible scenario of unconventional invasion of Taiwan.
I am all for rooting out US domestic elements who had dealings with these terrorists or enemies. But she does not consider any actions to deal with their foregin counterparts. Even N. Korean nuke crisis is purely for Bush associates' enrichment scheme. She never brought up geopolitical angle until I made the issue out of it.
My conclusion is that a lot of her accumulated materials are useful but her interpretation of them was many times real suspect.
You tell us what the article says to you, and then get back to us sparky.