[BibChr]

Unfortunately this article is no better than what it criticizes.

Yep, I'm with the others. Is there anything behind this, or is it just a lazy, easy, cheap shot so you can feel you don't have to think about the article?

Deliver, retract, or be discounted.

Dan

[tpaine]

Unfortunately this article is no better than what it criticizes. - mlo

Yep, I'm with the others. Is there anything behind this, or is it just a lazy, easy, cheap shot so you can feel you don't have to think about the article?

I agreed with mlo, and posted my own 'fallacy', [see 51], which proves the point. It has not been rationally rebutted. --- Can you comment?

--- "Deliver, retract, or be discounted".

[mlo]

Yep, I'm with the others. Is there anything behind this, or is it just a lazy, easy, cheap shot so you can feel you don't have to think about the article?

With the others how? With being rude jerks? They haven't said anything except to insult me with unfounded comments, and they don't even know what it is I have to criticize. Sometimes you people amaze me, there are such nasty people on FR.

I said something about the article and I said I would explain. The proper response is to discuss the article and the comments on it. It was not to insult each other. You guys ought to be ashamed.