Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lazamataz;Dataman; dead;dirtboy
Yeah, and did you note the AP's helpful little addendum?

He did not mention that the shortage is partially due to Republican senators who derailed many nominees of former Democratic President Clinton.

If it's true, it's fair enough. But I am going to want to see A WHOLE LOT MORE "did not mention" 's in future stories! Like these:

You know, stuff like that.

Dan

8 posted on 05/03/2002 9:38:07 AM PDT by BibChr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: BibChr
AP stands for Absolutely Partisan.
9 posted on 05/03/2002 9:42:11 AM PDT by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: all
billclinton is gangster, and represents gangster interests
all the federal judges he appointed are corrupt (and remain in his pocket)
slick willy is Head of Dem Party and rules Senate Dems with iron hand
he won't let them confirm President Bush's judges, because they are honest
to dupe liberals, he pretends problem is ''they are right-wing''
President Bush's appointees are excellent, our Republic depends on honest justices
Love, Palo
14 posted on 05/03/2002 9:46:54 AM PDT by palo verde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: BibChr
Brilliant post!! You should email it to AP.
15 posted on 05/03/2002 9:49:00 AM PDT by EllaMinnow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: BibChr
Way to hit the nail on the head, Dan!
17 posted on 05/03/2002 9:51:32 AM PDT by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: BibChr
... did not mention ...
bump!
25 posted on 05/03/2002 10:06:54 AM PDT by dixiechick2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: BibChr
GREAT POST!!
28 posted on 05/03/2002 10:12:51 AM PDT by maica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: BibChr
BTTT what you said.
37 posted on 05/03/2002 10:42:21 AM PDT by hattend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: BibChr
The AP can shove it up their (fill in the blank). This type of editorializing in press releases happens everyday and they can't even tell the truth when they do it. Its highly unprofessional.
47 posted on 05/03/2002 11:25:17 AM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: BibChr
Such a glaring example of the increasing tendency of "reporting" morphing into opining/editorializing.
56 posted on 05/03/2002 12:31:13 PM PDT by benjaminthomas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: BibChr
Amen.

It's an outrage that AP and other purported "news" services routinely insert such blatantly partisan editorializing into these articles.

63 posted on 05/03/2002 1:01:07 PM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: BibChr; landru; mudboy Slim; administrative simplification; scholar
...did not mention...

Beautiful analysis bump!!

64 posted on 05/03/2002 1:27:23 PM PDT by sultan88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: BibChr
I second the notion to send this list to the AP. What a lot of nerve for the writer to stick in that editorial comment. So typical...
70 posted on 05/03/2002 2:28:55 PM PDT by ncpastor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: BibChr
All good points.
81 posted on 05/03/2002 6:31:24 PM PDT by skr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: BibChr
But I am going to want to see A WHOLE LOT MORE "did not mention" 's in future stories! Like these:

as if the AP will ever be "fair and balanced!"

83 posted on 05/03/2002 6:56:28 PM PDT by Freee-dame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson