Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: E.G.C.
I'm past being impressed and am simply disgusted, with the Democrats and Bush. Bush, if he really wanted these nominees on the bench, should have been making recess appointments six months ago. Given his sorry record (almost all less conservative than those they replaced) of vacancy appointments to the Texas Supreme Court, one has to question whether these nominations weren't merely sops to conservatives.
10 posted on 05/03/2002 9:59:41 AM PDT by caltrop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: caltrop
Well, that's what he should do is make recess appointments. His heart is in the right place. Now if he'll just follow through, it may work out.
11 posted on 05/03/2002 10:10:44 AM PDT by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: caltrop
Recess appointments are only good until the end of the congressional session. They are not permanent, as I understand it, and the judges would have to be re=appointed or confirmed after that.

I could be wrong about this, but I believe that is why there have been no judiciary recess appointments.

12 posted on 05/03/2002 10:45:10 AM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson