You have no knowledge (even with the links provided on this thread) of the history or intent of the First Amendment. You are in favor of Judicial tyranny, on the side of Ruth Bader Ginsberg, former Klu Klux Klan member Hugo Black, Ted Kennedy, the CPUSA, the ACLU and others who have sought to tear down our Consitutional Republic.
Becaue you don't want something, you are willing to allow judges to force people to do what you want. You do not want it to come to a vote, for the law to be changed in a democratic manner, because you are afraid you would lose.
Be aware, someday your love of rule by judicial fiat will come back to bite you.
My, we're getting into foul name calling, aren't we. Where did that come from?
-Judicial tyranny -- nope. Not in favor of judicial tyranny or efforts by liberals to block conservative judges.
-Ruth Bader Ginsberg -- nope. Her logic was very flawed in siding with the Florida Supreme Court against Bush.
-KKK -- nope. In the 1950s I was threatened with death in the Deep South for saying a black man should have equal rights.
-Ted Kennedy -- nope. I went to see the bridge to Chappaquiddick once.
-CPUSA -- nope. They want to take my money and the fruit of my labor.
-ACLU -- sometimes. On religious issues the ACLU is right on. They also oppose CFR since it restricts free speech.
-Tearing down this Constitutional Republic. Ha Ha. Nope. I was a Republican Constitutional and economic conservative before the religious right made their big move to the Republican Party.
I go with Jefferson's 1802 letter referred to above about the First Amendment and the separation of church and state. I figure he was in a better position to know than you.
You still haven't denied that you are for state sponsored religion, have you?