That's putting it mildly. They've contridicted themselves so many times, it's ridiculous. Look at the 1995 decision on Rosenburg vs. UVA, compare it to the 2000 decision in Sante Fe, and tell me what the difference is. Nothing, except one deals with college and the other deals with high school. Apparantly, the USSC thinks certain religious expression in college is protected that is not so in high school. Where in the constitution do they come up with that?
Apparently, like alcohol and pornography, the courts feel religion is so dangerous those under 18 should not be exposed to it.