Posted on 05/02/2002 4:48:32 PM PDT by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
Edited on 04/22/2004 12:33:21 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
Isn't that what the ACLU has been doing with the help of federal courts all these years (and in this case)?
Sing it anyway, nobody can do a damn thing about it.
Isn't that what the ACLU has been doing with the help of federal courts, making law all these years (and in this case)?
I would submit most that people who still participate in Halloween are only in it for the free candy and have no idea how it came about.
No such thing.
No such thing.
I was hoping someone would catch on......Which is why i believe prayer has no place in school.
Saul Alinsky laid out the tactics they use against us in his book Rules for Radicals. When they go after religion, they usually employ the following Alinsky suggestions:
The fourth rule is: Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules. You can kill them with this, for they can no more obey their own rules than the Christian church can live up to Christianity. (Turn the other cheek, agree with the Supreme court, don't get upset when your religion is banned from the public square)The fourth rule carries within it the fifth rule: Ridicule is man's most potent weapon. It is almost impossible to counterattack ridicule. Also it infuriates the opposition, who then react to your advantage. (only snake-handing, backwoods yahoos who don't believe in science care about prayer in school)
The thirteenth rule: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it. (Jerry Falwell represents all Christians. Pedophile priests represent all Catholics )
When these attacks are made on faith, it is important to see who is attacking. Do searches on their names, find out what organizations to which they belong and what their faith, if any, is. As with Ben Stone and Professor Frank, 9 times out of 10 you will find a connection to a marxist group such as the National Lawyers Guild and a deep hostility to Christianity. These people are not concerned about our constitution and separating church and state.
They want Christianity eliminated.
And they play hardball to try to achieve that goal.
And a God which created the very laws of logic they need to borrow to dismiss him. No God no laws, no possibility of logic. But then it seems these people have not spent a lot of time sharpening their syllogisms.
It is still not there. Those words do not appear in the constitution. Only a liberal judges in their deluded imaginations find them, while at the same time not ever finding the tenth amendment. Repeal the 1st ammendment -- I dont think so -- impeach judges who refuse to submit the plain language of the constitution.
That's putting it mildly. They've contridicted themselves so many times, it's ridiculous. Look at the 1995 decision on Rosenburg vs. UVA, compare it to the 2000 decision in Sante Fe, and tell me what the difference is. Nothing, except one deals with college and the other deals with high school. Apparantly, the USSC thinks certain religious expression in college is protected that is not so in high school. Where in the constitution do they come up with that?
I suspect they are more than that but whatever the case, they are being used by those who are engaged in a pogrom against Christians.
Apparently, like alcohol and pornography, the courts feel religion is so dangerous those under 18 should not be exposed to it.
I see that some of us belong to the in-your-face style of religion that escalated into people getting killed during the Reformation.
There was an op-ed piece in the local paper yesterday that quoted a Supreme Court ruling, "The Constitution is abridged when the state affirmatively sponsors the particular religious practice of prayer." Say it, sing it, chant it, burp it, it is still prayer.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.